Create your Smart Home App in the Free Webinar on Home Automation. Register Now
One of our academic counsellors will contact you within 1 working day.
Click to Chat
1800-1023-196
+91-120-4616500
CART 0
Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material
Welcome User
OR
LOGIN
Complete Your Registration (Step 2 of 2 )
Free webinar on App Development Learn to create your own Smart Home App
16th Jan @ 5:00PM for Grade 1 to 10
Sit and relax as our customer representative will contact you within 1 business day
Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q
4qandqare given to be free positive charges placed at a distancelapart. So, chargeQneeded to achieve equilibrium for the entire system, should be of negative sign. LetQis at a distancexfromqcharge, and therefore(l−x)from4qcharge.From Coulomb's Law, force between two charges isr2kq1q2So, for equilibrium, force betweenqandQshould be equal to force between4qandQi.e, x2kqQ=(l−x)2k4qQ ...(i)(l−x)2=4x2Taking square root on both sides:l−x=2xl=3xx=3li.e, the chargeQshould be placed at a distance3lfrom chargeq.Now, applying the condition of equilibrium on+qcharge,⇒(3l)2kQq=l2k(4q)q⇒l2Q=4q(3l)2⇒Q=9×l24ql2⇒Q=94qSinceQshould be negative as explained above, soQ=9−4q
Post Question
Dear , Preparing for entrance exams? Register yourself for the free demo class from askiitians.
points won -