Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q

Question

ROSHAN MUJEEB · Answer

4qandqare given to be free positive charges placed at a distancelapart. So, chargeQneeded to achieve equilibrium for the entire system, should be of negative sign. LetQis at a distancexfromqcharge, and therefore(l−x)from4qcharge.
From Coulomb's Law, force between two charges isr2kq1q2
So, for equilibrium, force betweenqandQshould be equal to force between4qandQi.e, x2kqQ=(l−x)2k4qQ ...(i)
(l−x)2=4x2
Taking square root on both sides:
l−x=2x
l=3x
x=3l
i.e, the chargeQshould be placed at a distance3lfrom chargeq.
Now, applying the condition of equilibrium on+qcharge,
⇒(3l)2kQq=l2k(4q)q
⇒l2Q=4q(3l)2
⇒Q=9×l24ql2
⇒Q=94q
SinceQshould be negative as explained above, soQ=9−4q

Thank you for registering.

Register Now and Win Upto 25% Scholorship for a Full Academic Year !

Enter Your Details

Registration done!

Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q

Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve
equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q

1 Answers

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

Provide a better Answer & Earn Cool Goodies See our forum point policy

Other Related Questions on Electrostatics

ASK QUESTION

Answer and earn gift vouchers

View courses by askIITians

Design classes One-on-One in your own way with Top IITians/Medical Professionals

Complete Self Study Package designed by Industry Leading Experts

Live 1-1 coding classes to unleash the Creator in your Child

a Complete All-in-One Study package Fully Loaded inside a Tablet!

Register Now & Win Upto 25% Scholorship

Thank you for registering.

Register Now and Win Upto 25% Scholorship for a Full Academic Year !

Enter Your Details

Registration done!

Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q

Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieveequilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q

1 Answers

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

Provide a better Answer & Earn Cool Goodies See our forum point policy

Other Related Questions on Electrostatics

ASK QUESTION

Answer and earn gift vouchers

View courses by askIITians

Design classes One-on-One in your own way with Top IITians/Medical Professionals

Complete Self Study Package designed by Industry Leading Experts

Live 1-1 coding classes to unleash the Creator in your Child

a Complete All-in-One Study package Fully Loaded inside a Tablet!

Register Now & Win Upto 25% Scholorship

Two free positive charges 4q and q are a distance l apart. What charge Q is needed to achieve
equilibrium for the entire system and where should it be placed form charge q? Why we do not equate equilibrium at Q rather than at q or 4q for magnitude of Q