Flag Physical Chemistry> The choice of reducing agent in a particu...
question mark

The choice of reducing agent in a particular case depends on thermodynamic principles. How far do you agree with this statement? Explain the feasibility of the following reduction reactions on the bases of thermodynamic principles. i) reduction of Al2O3 with CO ii) Reduction of Fe2O3 with CO ?

sudhanshu , 12 Years ago
Grade 12
anser 1 Answers
Askiitians Tutor Team

The statement regarding the choice of reducing agent being influenced by thermodynamic principles is quite accurate. Thermodynamics plays a crucial role in determining whether a reduction reaction is feasible. To assess the feasibility of the reduction reactions you've mentioned, we can analyze the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) associated with each reaction. A negative ΔG indicates that a reaction is thermodynamically favorable. Let's delve into the specifics of each reaction.

Understanding Reduction Reactions

Reduction reactions involve the gain of electrons by a substance, often facilitated by a reducing agent. The choice of reducing agent is critical, as it must be able to donate electrons effectively while also being thermodynamically favorable in the context of the reaction.

i) Reduction of Al2O3 with CO

The reaction can be represented as follows:

  • Al2O3 + 3CO → 2Al + 3CO2

To evaluate the feasibility of this reaction, we need to consider the Gibbs free energy change. The standard Gibbs free energy of formation (ΔGf) values for Al2O3, Al, and CO2 are essential for this calculation. Generally, Al2O3 is quite stable due to its strong ionic bonds, and the reduction of aluminum oxide requires a significant amount of energy.

CO is a relatively weak reducing agent compared to others like carbon or hydrogen. The reaction with CO is not thermodynamically favorable under standard conditions because the formation of CO2 from CO is favored, and the ΔG for the overall reaction tends to be positive. Therefore, while it is theoretically possible to reduce Al2O3 with CO, it is not feasible under normal conditions without additional energy input, such as high temperatures.

ii) Reduction of Fe2O3 with CO

The reaction can be expressed as:

  • Fe2O3 + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO2

In this case, we again look at the Gibbs free energy change. Iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3) is less stable than aluminum oxide, making it more amenable to reduction. The ΔG for the formation of Fe from Fe2O3 is more favorable when using CO as a reducing agent. The reaction tends to be thermodynamically favorable, especially at elevated temperatures, where the equilibrium shifts towards the formation of iron and carbon dioxide.

Moreover, the reaction is often used in industrial processes, such as in blast furnaces, where CO is produced from the combustion of carbon sources. The high temperatures in these processes help drive the reaction forward, making it feasible.

Thermodynamic Considerations

In summary, the feasibility of reduction reactions is heavily influenced by thermodynamic principles. For the reduction of Al2O3 with CO, the reaction is not favorable under standard conditions due to the stability of Al2O3 and the positive ΔG. Conversely, the reduction of Fe2O3 with CO is thermodynamically favorable, particularly at high temperatures, making it a practical choice in metallurgical processes.

Understanding these principles helps in selecting appropriate reducing agents for various chemical reactions, ensuring efficiency and effectiveness in industrial applications.

ApprovedApproved
Last Activity: 7 Months ago
star
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Prepraring for the competition made easy just by live online class.

tv

Full Live Access

material

Study Material

removal

Live Doubts Solving

assignment

Daily Class Assignments