mycroft holmes
Last Activity: 15 Years ago
I wonder what is the basis for assuming that f(z) = z2 here.
Multiplying the first relation by w, we get
w/w+a + w/w+b + w/w+c = 2
or a/w+a + b/w+b + c/w+c = 1
Similarly from the second relation, we get a/a+w2 + b/b+w2 + c/c+w2 = 1
Thus, w and w2 are the roots of a/(x+a) + b/(x+b) + c/(x+c) = 1
which simplifies to x3 - (ab+bc+ca)x -2abc = 0. This means that the sum of roots of this cubic is zero. Let the third root be r.
Then r + w+w2 = 0 which means r = 1.
Thus a/a+1 + b/b+1 + c/c+1 = 1 or 1/a+1 + 1/b+1 + 1/c+1 = 2