

Last Activity: 15 Days ago
When discussing internal energy in thermodynamics, particularly in the context of adiabatic and polytropic processes, it's essential to understand the roles of specific heat capacities, Cp and Cv. These two values represent how much heat energy is required to change the temperature of a substance, but they apply under different conditions: Cv at constant volume and Cp at constant pressure. Let's break down when to use each and why internal energy is often expressed in terms of Cv.
Internal energy (U) is a state function that depends on the temperature of a system. The change in internal energy can be expressed as:
In a constant volume process, no work is done on or by the system (since volume does not change), so all the heat added goes into changing the internal energy. This is why we use Cv here. Conversely, in a constant pressure process, some of the heat energy goes into doing work (expanding against external pressure), which is why we can't directly equate heat added to the change in internal energy.
Now, let's consider adiabatic and polytropic processes. An adiabatic process is one where no heat is exchanged with the surroundings. In this case, we can still use the relationship for internal energy change:
In a polytropic process, which can be represented by the equation PV^n = constant, the specific heat used can vary depending on the value of n. However, when calculating changes in internal energy, we still rely on Cv because the internal energy is fundamentally related to temperature changes, regardless of the pressure or volume conditions.
The reason we often express internal energy changes as ΔU = nCvΔT, even in processes that are not strictly at constant volume, is due to the nature of internal energy itself. Internal energy is a function of temperature alone for an ideal gas, meaning that:
In contrast, Cp is more relevant when considering enthalpy (H), which accounts for both internal energy and the work done by the system during expansion. Therefore, while Cp is crucial for processes involving heat transfer at constant pressure, it does not directly relate to changes in internal energy in the same straightforward manner as Cv does.
To summarize:
Understanding these principles helps clarify why Cv is often the go-to for internal energy calculations, regardless of the specific process conditions. This foundational knowledge is crucial for mastering thermodynamics and its applications in various engineering and scientific fields.
Last Activity: 15 Days ago
When discussing internal energy in thermodynamics, particularly in the context of adiabatic and polytropic processes, it's essential to understand the roles of specific heat capacities, \( C_v \) and \( C_p \). These two values represent how much heat energy is required to change the temperature of a substance, but they apply under different conditions: \( C_v \) at constant volume and \( C_p \) at constant pressure. Let's break down when to use each and why internal energy is often expressed with \( C_v \).
Internal energy (\( U \)) is a state function that depends on the temperature and the amount of substance present. The change in internal energy can be expressed as:
In a constant volume process, all the heat added to the system goes into increasing the internal energy, which is why we use \( C_v \). In contrast, during a constant pressure process, some of the heat goes into doing work (expanding against the external pressure), which is why \( C_p \) is used in that context.
In adiabatic processes, there is no heat exchange with the surroundings. The relationship between internal energy and temperature change remains valid, and we can express it as:
Adiabatic Process: \( \Delta U = nC_v \Delta T \)
Here, \( C_v \) is appropriate because, despite the absence of heat transfer, the internal energy change is still a function of temperature change alone. The work done by the system during expansion or compression is compensated by the change in internal energy.
In polytropic processes, which can be seen as a generalization of both constant pressure and constant volume processes, the situation is a bit more complex. However, if we consider the specific heat at constant volume, we can still derive changes in internal energy using:
Polytropic Process: \( \Delta U = nC_v \Delta T \)
This holds true because the internal energy change is fundamentally linked to temperature change, regardless of the specific path taken (as long as we are considering ideal gases). The polytropic process can be represented with a specific heat that varies with the process, but the internal energy change remains dependent on \( C_v \).
The reason we don't use \( C_p \) when calculating internal energy changes is that \( C_p \) accounts for the work done during expansion at constant pressure. In essence, when you apply heat at constant pressure, part of that energy goes into doing work on the surroundings, which does not contribute to the internal energy of the system. Thus, using \( C_p \) would not accurately reflect the change in internal energy.
In summary, the choice between \( C_v \) and \( C_p \) hinges on the nature of the process and what aspect of energy you are examining. For internal energy, \( C_v \) is the go-to value because it reflects the energy associated with temperature changes without the influence of work done during expansion or compression.
Prepraring for the competition made easy just by live online class.
Full Live Access
Study Material
Live Doubts Solving
Daily Class Assignments
Last Activity: 3 Years ago
Last Activity: 3 Years ago