MY CART (5)

Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material

ITEM
DETAILS
MRP
DISCOUNT
FINAL PRICE
Total Price: Rs.

There are no items in this cart.
Continue Shopping
Menu
Grade: 12

                        

the flux of a constant vector through any closed surface is zero.. can you explain the statement with an example?

4 months ago

Answers : (3)

Arun
24738 Points
							
am assuming , you meant flux through any closed surface of any shape or any area, over Vector Field is zero. Looks to me like a Vector Field with Zero Divergence at every point. Limit definition of Divergence at a point is
$Div F =lt_{V↦0} \frac{\oint _A \vec{F} .\vec{dA}}{V} $
$=lt_{V↦0} \frac{\Phi _A}{V}$
In the above formula , it's meant to be double integral , but couldn't find the latex syntax . The syntax $\oiint$ didn't work.
Note here, $\Phi_A $ is the total flux through the closed surface , and not any surface. Which by your question is Zero.
So it's a field with zero divergence at any point. Zero divergence through any closed surface implies Vector Field with zero divergence everywhere.
Now it doesn't mean that , flux through some random surface that is not closed , be zero as well. Flux through the surface of sphere is by assumption zero, but there may still be flux through some sheet of paper in space. And here comes the world of Magnetic Field. A solenoidal magnetic field with zero divergence everywhere - no source or sink.
Examples of Solenoidal Field in 3D is difficult to find,so I will give you simplest of example.
$F = (xy)\hat{j}-(xz)\hat{k}$
$DivF=∇.F = 0$
⇒ Flux through any closed Surface is also Zero. Use divergence theorem
$\oint _A \vec{F}.\vec{dA} =∫∫∫_V divF dV$
 
4 months ago
Vikas TU
12133 Points
							
Dear student 
I don’t think that’s true. Consider a uniform vector field. It is both solenoidal (zero divergence, flux through any closed surface) and irrotational (zero curl).
If the vector field (in 3D space) decays more rapidly than 1/r to zero as you approach infinity and the field is “sufficiently smooth” (true of all physical fields), then Helmholtz’s decomposition theorem applies.
nd the only way for both the divergence and curl to be zero is for the vector field to be identically zero. In that case, you can’t have a non-zero vector field for which the flux through all closed surfaces (divergence) is zero and the curl is everywhere zero.
Physically, there are no uniform vector fields throughout all space if the field is created by sources. That is probably what the statement you are thinking about is getting at.
Hope this helps and does not mislead or confuse you.
4 months ago
Yashraj
324 Points
							
sice total flux coming inside will be equal to total flux going outside 
so net flux is zero 
take the fell of flux to understand it
 
4 months ago
Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?
Answer & Earn Cool Goodies


Course Features

  • 731 Video Lectures
  • Revision Notes
  • Previous Year Papers
  • Mind Map
  • Study Planner
  • NCERT Solutions
  • Discussion Forum
  • Test paper with Video Solution


Course Features

  • 70 Video Lectures
  • Revision Notes
  • Test paper with Video Solution
  • Mind Map
  • Study Planner
  • NCERT Solutions
  • Discussion Forum
  • Previous Year Exam Questions


Ask Experts

Have any Question? Ask Experts

Post Question

 
 
Answer ‘n’ Earn
Attractive Gift
Vouchers
To Win!!! Click Here for details