Thank you for registering.

One of our academic counsellors will contact you within 1 working day.

Please check your email for login details.
MY CART (5)

Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material

ITEM
DETAILS
MRP
DISCOUNT
FINAL PRICE
Total Price: Rs.

There are no items in this cart.
Continue Shopping

In an SN1 reaction, why does a tertiary carbocation has more reactivity than a primary carbocation. The nucleophile anyhow has to attack the carbocation and a tertiary carbocation will offer steric hindrance. A primary carbocation won’t offer a steric hindrance to the nucleophile. I know a tertiary carbocation is more stable than a primary carbocation but why is steric crowding not taken into consideration?

In an SN1 reaction, why does a tertiary carbocation has more reactivity than a primary carbocation. The nucleophile anyhow has to attack the carbocation and a tertiary carbocation will offer steric hindrance. A primary carbocation won’t offer a steric hindrance to the nucleophile. 
I know a tertiary carbocation is more stable than a primary carbocation but why is steric crowding not taken into consideration?

Grade:12

1 Answers

Umakant biswal
5359 Points
4 years ago
@ ishaan 
in this case the stability dominates the hindrance . 
beacuse the hindrance angle of attack is more , stability will be the factor which taken into consideration , and not steric crowding . 
HOPE U ARE CLEARS NOW 
ALL THE BEST . 
LET ME KNOW IF ANY FURTHER DOUBT ..

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

Provide a better Answer & Earn Cool Goodies See our forum point policy

ASK QUESTION

Get your questions answered by the expert for free