Thank you for registering.

One of our academic counsellors will contact you within 1 working day.

Please check your email for login details.
MY CART (5)

Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material

ITEM
DETAILS
MRP
DISCOUNT
FINAL PRICE
Total Price: Rs.

There are no items in this cart.
Continue Shopping

It is often said that the radius of a cation is less than parent atom due to decrease in number of shells. But my view point is that the number of shells in an atom are constant I.e., infinite. They can be empty but they are there. So is this correct. Please give reason also.

It is often said that the radius of a cation is less than parent atom due to decrease in number of shells. But my view point is that the number of shells in an atom are constant I.e., infinite. They can be empty but they are there. So is this correct. Please give reason also.

Grade:12

1 Answers

Suraj Singh
148 Points
4 years ago
The shells are not something like rigid circles... It is just a path of electrons in an atom.. It exists only if there are electrons in that shell... Don`t think that it is a series of concentric circles which forms shell.. So if that electron leaves the shell that shell will not exist... SO the radius decreases... Hope U like it

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

Provide a better Answer & Earn Cool Goodies See our forum point policy

ASK QUESTION

Get your questions answered by the expert for free