Last Activity: 12 Years ago
Actually ionisation potential means that "the amount of enrgy required to remove the electron from the valency shell of a particular atom".We have to find it as the depend upon its atomic size.It means that low size atoms have a low tendency to removing the electron.
Last Activity: 11 Years ago
The Ionization Potentials and Shielding
of Electrons in the First Shell
The Bohr model of a hydrogen-like ion predicts that the total energy E of an electron is given by
E = −Z²R/n²
where Z is the net charge experienced by the electron, n is the principal quantum number and R is a constant
equal to approximately 13.6 electron volts (eV). This formula is the result of the total energy being
equal to
E = − Ze²/(2r
n
)
where e is the charge of the electron and r
n is the orbit radius when the principal quantum
number is n. The orbit radius is given by
r
n
= n²h/(Zm
e
e²)
where h is Planck''s constant divided by 2π and m
e is the mass of the electron.
Shell Structure
Electrons in atoms are organized in shells whose capacities are equal to 2m², where m is an integer. Thus there
can be at most 2 electrons in the first shell, 8 in the second shell and 8 in the third shell and 18 in each of the fourth
and fifth shells. Here only the first shell
is being considered. For elements above helium all of the electrons have been removed except two.
Here are all the ionization potentials for such ions.
The Ionization Potentials for the
Electrons
in the First Shell for the
Elements Helium through Copper
Proton
Number
Ionization
Potential
First
Electron
Ionization
Potential
Second
Electron
2 54.41778 24.58741
3 122.45429 75.64018
4 217.71865 153.89661
5 340.2258 259.37521
6 489.99334 392.087
7 667.046 552.0718
8 871.4101 739.29
9 1103.1176 953.9112
10 1362.1995 1195.8286
11 1648.702 1465.121
12 1962.665 1761.805
13 2304.141 2085.98
14 2673.182 2437.63
15 3069.842 2816.91
16 3494.1892 3223.78
17 3946.296 3658.521
18 4426.2296 4120.8857
19 4934.046 4610.8
20 5469.864 5128.8
21 6033.712 5674.8
22 6625.82 6249
23 7246.12 6851.3
24 7894.81 7481.7
25 8571.94 8140.6
26 9277.69 8828
27 10012.12 9544.1
28 10775.4 10288.8
29 11567.617 11062.38
The Ionization Potential of the First Electron
as a Function of Proton Number
An ion with only one electron is equivalent to the hydrogen atom but having a positive
charge of Z instead of one. The Bohr theory applies to such system. According to the
Bohr theory the ionization potential should be
IE = Z²R/n²
R is constant and n, the quantum number, is equal to 1. Thus the ionization potential should be proportional
to the proton number squared. Here is the plot of the relationship.
It certainly looks like a quadratic relationship. To test this proposition more precisely the logarithms of the
ionization potential and the proton numbers are computed. The plot of these quantitites is shown below.
The regression equation of the logartithm of ionization potential on the logarithm of the proton number is
ln(IE) = 2.604026184 + 2.004055992ln(#p)
[2029.1] [4123.2]
R² = 0.999998471
The numbers in the square brackets are the t-ratios for the regression coefficients. For a regression coefficient to
be statistically significantly different its magnitude must be greater than 2.0. As can be seen the regression coefficient for
ln(#p) is highly significant. And the value appears to be essentially 2, as the Bohr theory predicts. However this proposition
is tested by comparing the difference between the regression coefficient and 2 with the standard deviation of the regression
coefficient. Although the difference is small, 0.004056, the standard deviation of the regression coefficient is even smaller,
0.000486039, the ratio is 8.3. Common sense however says that the Bohr theory is verified for the first electron in the
the first shell.
The Z in the formula is the net charge experienced by the electron, the number of protons #p in the nucleus less any
shielding ε. The Bohr theory equation is then
IE = R(#p−ε)²
which can be expressed as
IE = R(#p² − 2#p*ε + ε²)
where R is the Rydberg constant, 13.6 eV.
Thus the appropriate regression equation would be
IE = c
0
+ c
1
#p + c
2
(#p)²
in which
c
1
<0
c
2
≅ R
Since in this case there seems to be no reason for there to be any shielding for the first electron the value of ε should be essentially zero.
The results of the regression are:
IE = 17.63611461 − 4.994593419#p + 13.89254281(#p)²
[5.1] [-9.7] [858.9]
R² = 0.999998221
The coefficient of #p is negative but statistically different from zero. The coefficient of (#p)² is notably close
to 13.6. The value of ε can be found as
ε = ½(−c
1
/c
2
) = 0.179758072
Somehow some small portion of the charge of the nucleus is being shielded.
The Bohr theory works marvelously well for an atom or ion with one electron but not nearly so well for multiple electrons.
One line of approach is to treat the atom or ion with two electrons as a many-body problem. This approach does not come up
with much in the way of definite results. An alternate line of approach is to say that electrons in the same shell shield
some fraction of a positive charge in the nucleus. This
shielding ratio would be based upon the proportion of the
charge of an electron which is closer to the nucleus than the center of an electron. The value of one half would be
plausible. However the shielding ratio could be affected by any deviation from spherical symmetry.
The Shielding Ratios of the Electrons in the First Shell
as a Function of Proton Number of the Nucleus
The shielding ratio ρ for the electrons in the first shell can be computed as
ρ = 1 − E
2
(#p)/E
1
(#p)
where E
1 and E
2 are the ionization potentials for the first and second electrons, respectively.
The values for the elements for which the data is available in the CRC Handbook of Physics and Chemistry
82nd Edition (2001-2002)
are given below.
The Shielding Ratio of
the Electrons
in the First Shell
for the Elements Helium through Copper
Proton
Number
Shielding
Ratio
2 0.548173226
3 0.382298652
4 0.293139977
5 0.237638033
6 0.199811573
7 0.172363225
8 0.151616443
9 0.135258834
10 0.122134019
11 0.111348807
12 0.10234044
13 0.09468214
14 0.088116709
15 0.082392514
16 0.077388254
17 0.072922812
18 0.068985102
19 0.065513374
20 0.062353287
21 0.059484443
22 0.056871451
23 0.054487091
24 0.052326782
25 0.050319998
26 0.048470039
27 0.046745345
28 0.045158416
29 0.043676844
The graph of these data displays a very regular pattern.
This appears to be a relationship of the form
ρ = α(#p)-β
The value of the parameters α and β can be found by plotting the logarithms of ρ and #p, as below.
A regression of ln(ρ) on ln(#p) gives:
ln(ρ) = 0.093012504 − 0.956463724ln(#p)
[16.2] [-439.2]
R² = 0.999865247
The results indicate that the shielding ratio is predictable on the basis of the proton number, but the shielding of positive charge in the nucleus by the electrons in the first shell
is primarily important for small nuclides.
The Ionization Potential for the Second
Electron as a Function of the Proton Number
Previously a regression equation of the form
IE = c
0
+ c
1
#p + c
2
(#p)²
was applied to the data for the first electron and it was found that there was a shielding of 0.179758072 units of charge.
When the data for the ionization potentials of the second electron is used the regression results are
IE = 20.41371337 − 21.54911763#p + 13.85998758(#p)²
[6.2] [-44.6] [912.9]
R² = 0.999998302
Again the coefficient of #p is negative and the coefficient of (#p)² is notably close to the Rydberg constant of 13.6.
The value of the shielding that is found from the coefficients is 0.777385892. The difference between this value and the
value for the first electron is 0.59762782, indicating that the second electron shields about 0.6 of a unit charge of the
nucleus. This is notably close to the value of 0.5 suggested by the simplest formulation of the notion of shielding by
electrons in the same shell.
Prepraring for the competition made easy just by live online class.
Full Live Access
Study Material
Live Doubts Solving
Daily Class Assignments
Get your questions answered by the expert for free
Last Activity: 2 Years ago
Last Activity: 2 Years ago
Last Activity: 2 Years ago
Last Activity: 2 Years ago
Last Activity: 2 Years ago