Yes, it is dimensionally correct.
To begin, if we look at the formula “S=u+a/2(2t-1)”, at the LHS, we have “S”, which is the distance travelled in nth second,
so dimensionally it is the velocity as it is the distance travelled in the given time(i.e, v=d/t), so its dimensional formula is [M0LT-1].
And on RHS, we have “u+a/2(2t-1)”, and according to rules od dimensionall analysis we have two terms on RHS seperated by plus operation(+),
1- “u”
2- “a/2(2t-1)”
and the dimensional formula of the first term is [M0LT-1] as it is the velocity(u).
Whereas, the dimensional formula of the second term ( a/2(2t-1) ),
having terms a for acceleration and t for time, and by the rules of dimensional analysis in the expression – a/2, 2 is also having the same dimensions as that of a(i.e, of acceleration) and similarly the other expression -2t-1, having dimensions of time. So, acceleration(a)=velocity(v)/time(t) ,(a=v/t) and by subtituting in the expression( a/2(2t-1) ) we have (v/t)*t=v so the dimensional formula of the second term is [M0LT-1].
Hence the equation [M0LT-1]=[M0LT-1]+[M0LT-1], is dimensionally correct.