Question icon
Grade 12th passGeneral Physics

In Sample Problem 9, we saw an example (a skater) in which kinetic energy appeared but no external work was done. Consider the opposite case. A screwdriver is held tightly against a rotating grinding wheel. Here external work is done but the kinetic energy of the screwdriver does not change. Explain this apparent contradiction

Profile image of Ashhfaq
5 Years agoGrade 12th pass
Answers icon

1 Answer

Profile image of Askiitians Tutor Team
ApprovedApproved Tutor Answer0 Years ago

To understand the situation with the screwdriver and the grinding wheel, we need to delve into the concepts of work, energy, and how they interact in different systems. At first glance, it might seem contradictory that external work is being done on the screwdriver while its kinetic energy remains unchanged. However, this can be clarified by examining the forces at play and the nature of the energy transfer involved.

Understanding Work and Energy

Work is defined as the transfer of energy that occurs when a force is applied to an object, causing it to move. The formula for work (W) is:

  • W = F × d × cos(θ)

Where:

  • F is the force applied
  • d is the distance moved by the object in the direction of the force
  • θ is the angle between the force and the direction of motion

The Scenario with the Screwdriver

In the case of the screwdriver against the grinding wheel, external work is indeed being done. The grinding wheel exerts a force on the screwdriver, and if the screwdriver were to move, work would be done on it. However, the key point here is that the screwdriver is held tightly against the wheel, preventing any displacement in the direction of the applied force. Since there is no movement, the distance (d) in the work equation is zero, leading to:

  • W = F × 0 = 0

This means that while the grinding wheel is applying a force, no work is done on the screwdriver because it does not move. Therefore, its kinetic energy remains constant.

Energy Transfer and Friction

Now, let’s consider the energy dynamics involved. The grinding wheel is rotating and has kinetic energy. When the screwdriver is pressed against it, the energy from the grinding wheel is transferred to the screwdriver through friction. This friction generates heat, which is a form of energy transfer, but it does not change the kinetic energy of the screwdriver itself. Instead, the energy is dissipated as thermal energy due to the friction between the screwdriver and the wheel.

Illustrating with an Analogy

Think of it like a person pushing against a wall. If they push with all their might but the wall doesn’t move, they are exerting a force, but no work is done on the wall. Instead, the energy from their muscles is converted into heat and fatigue in their body. Similarly, in our screwdriver scenario, the energy from the grinding wheel is not increasing the screwdriver's kinetic energy but is instead being transformed into heat due to friction.

Conclusion

In summary, the apparent contradiction arises from a misunderstanding of how work and energy interact. While external work can be done on an object, if that object does not move, its kinetic energy will not change. The energy from the grinding wheel is transferred to the screwdriver in the form of heat, illustrating the complex interplay between work, energy, and motion in physical systems.