badge image

Enroll For Free Now & Improve Your Performance.

User Icon
User Icon
User Icon
User Icon
User Icon

Thank you for registering.

One of our academic counsellors will contact you within 1 working day.

Please check your email for login details.

Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material

Total Price: Rs.

There are no items in this cart.
Continue Shopping
Grade: 12


Please explain Langmuir absorption isotherm?

8 years ago

Answers : (1)

65 Points

The Langmuir equation (also known as the Langmuir isothermLangmuir adsorption equation or Hill-Langmuir equation) relates the coverage or adsorption of molecules on a solid surface to gas pressure or concentration of a medium above the solid surface at a fixed temperature. The equation was developed by Irving Langmuir in 1916. The equation is stated as:

 \theta  =\frac{\alpha \cdot P}{1+\alpha \cdot P}

θ is the fractional coverage of the surface, P is the gas pressure or concentration, α is a constant.

The constant α is the Langmuir adsorption constant and increases with an increase in the binding energy of adsorption and with a decrease in temperature.

Equation Derivation

The Langmuir equation is derived starting from the equilibrium between empty surface sites (S^*), particles (P) and filled particle sites (SP)

 S^* + P  \rightleftharpoons  SP

The equilibrium constant K is thus given by the equation:

 K  =\frac{[SP]}{[S^*][P]}

Because the number of filled surface sites (SP) is proportional to θ, the number of unfilled sites (S^*) is proportional to 1-θ, and the number of particles is proportional to the gas pressure or concentration (p), the equation can be rewritten as:

 \alpha  =\frac{\theta}{(1-\theta)p}

where \alpha is a constant.

Rearranging this as follows:

 \theta  = \alpha(1-\theta)p
 \theta = p\alpha  - p\theta\alpha
 \theta  + p\theta\alpha = p\alpha
 \theta (1 + p\alpha) = p\alpha

leads to Langmuir equation:

 \theta  =\frac{\alpha \cdot p}{1+\alpha \cdot p}

Other equations relating to adsorption exist, such as the Temkin equation (page does not exist) or the Freundlich equation. The Langmuir equation (as a relationship between the concentration of a compound adsorbingto binding sites and the fractional occupancy of the binding sites) is equivalent to the Hill equation (biochemistry).

[edit]Statistical Derivation

Langmuir isotherm can also be derived using statistical mechanics with the following assumptions:
1. Suppose there are M active sites to which N particles bind.
2. An active site can be occupied only by one particle.
3. Active sites are independent. Probability of one site being occupied is not dependent on the status of adjacent sites.

The partition function for a system of N particles adsorbed to M sites (under the assumption that there are more sites than the particles) is:


with  q\lambda being the distribution function for one particle:

 q=q_v(T)^3  and \lambda=e^{\beta \mu}.

If we allow the number of particles to increase so that all sites are occupied, the partition function becomes:

 \Xi(\mu,M,T) = \sum_{N=0}^M Q(N,M,T)= \sum_{N=0}^M \binom{M}{N} (q\lambda)^N=(1+q\lambda)^M

We can see that this partition function of a single active state can be expressed as

\xi = 1+q\lambda.

The average number of occupied spaces can now be easily calculated.

\langle N \rangle=\frac{\partial{\ln{\Xi(\mu,M,T)}}}{\partial{\beta \mu}}=M\frac{\partial{\ln{\xi(\mu,M,T)}}}{\partial{\beta \mu}}

Rearranging yields

 \langle s \rangle=\frac{<N>}{M}=\frac{\partial{\ln{\xi(T)}}}{\partial{\beta \mu}}=\lambda\frac{\partial\ln{\xi(T)}}{\partial\lambda}

And finally:

 \langle s \rangle=\frac{q\lambda}{1+q\lambda}

[edit]Equation Fitting

The Langmuir equation is expressed here as:

 {\Gamma} = \Gamma_{max} \frac{K c}{1 + K c}

where K = Langmuir equilibrium constant, c = aqueous concentration (or gaseous partial pressure), Γ = amount adsorbed, and Γmax = maximum amount adsorbed as c increases.

The equilibrium constant is actually given by \Gamma_{max}:

 {\Gamma(c=K^{-1})} = \Gamma_{max} \frac{K K^{-1}}{1 + K K^{-1}} = \frac{\Gamma_{max}}{2}

The Langmuir equation can be fitted to data by linear regression and nonlinear regression methods. Commonly used linear regression methods are: Lineweaver–Burk, Eadie-Hofstee, Scatchard, and Langmuir.

The double reciprocal of the Langmuir equation yields the Lineweaver-Burk equation:

 \frac{1}{\Gamma} = \frac{1}{\Gamma_{max}} + \frac{1}{\Gamma_{max}Kc}

A plot of (1/Γ) versus (1/c) yields a slope = 1/(ΓmaxK) and an intercept = 1/Γmax. The Lineweaver-Burk regression is very sensitive to data error and it is strongly biased toward fitting the data in the low concentration range. It was proposed in 1934. Another common linear form of the Langmuir equation is the Eadie-Hofstee equation:

 \Gamma = \Gamma_{max} - \frac{\Gamma}{Kc}

A plot of (Γ) versus (Γ/c) yields a slope = -1/K and an intercept = Γmax. The Eadie-Hofstee regression has some bias toward fitting the data in the low concentration range. It was proposed in 1942 and 1952. Another rearrangement yields the Scatchard regression:

 \frac{\Gamma}{c} = K\Gamma_{max} - K\Gamma

A plot of (Γ/c) versus (Γ) yields a slope = -K and an intercept = KΓmax. The Scatchard regression is biased toward fitting the data in the high concentration range. It was proposed in 1949. Note that if you invert the x and y axes, then this regression would convert into the Eadie-Hofstee regression discussed earlier. The last linear regression commonly used is the Langmuir linear regression proposed by Langmuir himself in 1918:

 \frac{c}{\Gamma} = \frac{c}{\Gamma_{max}} + \frac{1}{K\Gamma_{max}}

A plot of (c/Γ) versus (c) yields a slope = 1/Γmax and an intercept = 1/(KΓmax). This regression is often erroneously called the Hanes-Woolf regression. The Hanes-Woolf regression was proposed in 1932 and 1957 for fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation, which is similar in form to the Langmuir equation. Nevertheless, Langmuir proposed this linear regression technique in 1918, and it should be referred to as the Langmuir linear regression when applied to adsorption isotherms. The Langmuir regression has very little sensitivity to data error. It has some bias toward fitting the data in the middle and high concentration range.

Plz. approve my answer by clicking Yes given below, if u loved it... Plz/....

And best of luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


8 years ago
Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?
Answer & Earn Cool Goodies

Course Features

  • 728 Video Lectures
  • Revision Notes
  • Previous Year Papers
  • Mind Map
  • Study Planner
  • NCERT Solutions
  • Discussion Forum
  • Test paper with Video Solution

Course Features

  • 731 Video Lectures
  • Revision Notes
  • Test paper with Video Solution
  • Mind Map
  • Study Planner
  • NCERT Solutions
  • Discussion Forum
  • Previous Year Exam Questions

Ask Experts

Have any Question? Ask Experts

Post Question

Answer ‘n’ Earn
Attractive Gift
To Win!!! Click Here for details