0

Guest

Courses New

While integrating on both the sides, instead of substituting (1+logx) with " t" why have they splited the numerator and substituting log x as "t". Even the former one does well. And the answers i get from both the method are pity different. My question is that why can`t take (1+log x) as "t". Please refer the image uploaded. Hope I could hear from you at the earliest.

While integrating on both the sides, instead of substituting (1+logx) with " t" why have they splited the numerator and substituting log x as "t". Even the former one does well. And the answers i get from both the method are pity different. My question is that why can`t take (1+log x) as "t". Please refer the image uploaded. Hope I could hear from you at the earliest.

Question Image
Grade:12

1 Answers

Arnab Saha
43 Points
7 years ago
After you`re done integrating, you put a c which accounts for a missing constant right? Note that, even if you follow your method there`s nothing wrong with it. Assuming that you`ve already tried your method you`ll notice that the only difference between the book solution and your solution is just a 1/2. Your solution has an extra 1/2.Now, where does your 1/2 go then? (Hint: It`s included within the constant part c in the book`s solution.) Hope this helped. Please ask if you have any further queries.

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

Other Related Questions on Differential Calculus

View all Questions »

ASK QUESTION

Get your questions answered by the expert for free

Answer and earn gift vouchers

Win Gift vouchers upto Rs 500/-

View courses by askIITians

Design classes One-on-One in your own way with Top IITians/Medical Professionals

Click Here Know More

Complete Self Study Package designed by Industry Leading Experts

Click Here Know More

Live 1-1 coding classes to unleash the Creator in your Child

Click Here Know More

a Complete All-in-One Study package Fully Loaded inside a Tablet!

Click Here Know More