Last Activity: 6 Years ago
I believe expanding the products in the terms and computing the discriminant is an overkill on this problem. One of the answers does something along the lines of what I would have done on this problem. I will try to add a bit more rigor on that.Because a, b, and c are distinct, we can assume without loss of generality that a>b>c. Letf(x)=a(x−b)(x−c)+b(x−c)(x−a)+c(x−a)(x−b)Then, it is clear that f(a) has the same sign as a, f(b) is oppositely signed from b, and f(c) again has the same sign as c. If a and c bear the same sign, then it is clear that there will be two real roots, one between a and b and the other between b and c. If they are oppositely signed, then once again there will be two real roots and one of them will lie either between a and b, or b and c.Thus, all we can conclude here is that they will be real at all times.
Prepraring for the competition made easy just by live online class.
Full Live Access
Study Material
Live Doubts Solving
Daily Class Assignments
Get your questions answered by the expert for free
Last Activity: 1 Year ago
Last Activity: 1 Year ago
Last Activity: 2 Years ago