Question icon
12 grade chemistry others

Aromatic aldehydes are less reactive than aliphatic aldehydes in nucleophilic addition reaction. Give reason.

Profile image of Aniket Singh
1 Year agoGrade
Answers icon

1 Answer

Profile image of Askiitians Tutor Team
1 Year ago

Aromatic aldehydes are generally less reactive than aliphatic aldehydes in nucleophilic addition reactions due to the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing effects of the aromatic ring.

Electron-Withdrawing Effect of Aromatic Ring: Aromatic rings, such as benzene rings, contain conjugated pi electrons that can delocalize around the ring. These pi electrons can interact with the electron pair of the carbonyl group in the aldehyde, making it less available for attack by nucleophiles. The delocalization of pi electrons in the aromatic ring exerts an electron-withdrawing effect, which reduces the electron density on the carbonyl carbon atom. This reduced electron density makes it less susceptible to nucleophilic attack.

Resonance Stabilization: Aromatic compounds can undergo resonance stabilization, which spreads the negative charge across multiple atoms in the ring. This resonance stabilization helps in reducing the reactivity of the carbonyl group. In contrast, aliphatic aldehydes lack this resonance stabilization, and the electron density on the carbonyl carbon is more localized, making it more susceptible to nucleophilic attack.

Steric Effects: Aromatic aldehydes often have bulky aromatic groups attached to the carbonyl carbon. These bulky groups can hinder the approach of nucleophiles to the carbonyl carbon, reducing the reaction rate. Aliphatic aldehydes, on the other hand, typically have smaller alkyl groups, which do not create as much steric hindrance.

Overall, the combination of electron-withdrawing effects, resonance stabilization, and steric hindrance in aromatic aldehydes makes them less reactive toward nucleophilic addition reactions compared to aliphatic aldehydes.


question mark

is Pradeep Chemistry+Ncert sufficient for all of the theory of Jee Mains Chemistry?


Hi, I’m a self-study JEE 2027 aspirant with a large 11th backlog. Since I don’t think 6–8 hour one-shots are sufficient to cover the full theory + breadth of problem types of a JEE chapter, I’ve shifted from lecture-based preparation to book-based self-study.


I have a problem with using NCERT as my primary chemistry source. In my experience, it is concise and information-heavy, but often lacks detailed explanations, systematic organisation of concepts, and categorisation of problem types. This seems especially problematic for Physical and Organic Chemistry, where I feel that simply reading NCERT may not give enough depth or problem-solving preparation.


So I’m considering this approach:


Pradeep Chemistry → complete the chapter thoroughly from Pradeep → then read NCERT for that chapter → solve JEE Main PYQs/problems.


My main question is:


Is Pradeep + NCERT sufficient as the complete theory source for JEE Main-level Chemistry?


In other words, after thoroughly completing a chapter from Pradeep and then NCERT, can I consider the theory part of that chapter complete for JEE Main, with only PYQs/problem practice remaining?


I’m asking specifically about JEE Main level, not Advanced.


Also, if Pradeep is not sufficient, what specific gap does it leave, and what would you recommend as a better book-based alternative for self-study?

Grade 1212 grade chemistry others
0 Answer Available

Last Activity: 2 Days ago