Guest

Sir , I cant visulize this image and understand it can you explain?

Sir , I cant visulize this image and understand it can you explain?

Question Image
Grade:11

3 Answers

Aarti Gupta
askIITians Faculty 300 Points
9 years ago
The above figure can be understand in terms of Molecular orbital theory.According to this theory the electrons are not assigned to individual bonds between atoms, but are treated as moving under the influence of the nuclei in the whole molecule they are the fundamental constituents of matter involved in bonding,. Electrons are shared among individual atoms in a molecule to form covalent chemical bonds. Generally, up to three bonds can form between atoms in a molecule. Single, or sigma covalent bonds which result from the interaction between the nuclei of two discrete atoms; multiple bonds then can result due to the additional formation of pi bonds between overlapping orbitals of like symmetries.Electrons in sigma bonds are located between the nuclei, while electrons in pi bonds are delocalized in regions above and below the nuclei.This theory uses a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) to represent molecular orbitals resulting from bonds between atoms. These orbitals are divided into 1.Bonding orbitals
2.Anti-bonding orbitals, and
3.Non-bonding orbitals.

The Schrödinger equation is used to build up the orbital bases of an atom or molecule. A molecular orbital is a Schrödinger orbital that includes two or more nuclei. If this orbital is of the type in which the electron(s) in the orbital have a higher probability of being between nuclei than elsewhere, the orbital will be a bonding orbital, and will tend to hold the nuclei together. A bonding orbital is of lower energy than the two contributing atomic bases. For bonding orbitals, the atomic orbital of lower energy contributes more to the molecular orbital, causing the molecular orbital to more closely resemble it. If the electrons tend to be present in a molecular orbital in which they spend more time elsewhere than between the nuclei, the orbital will function as an anti-bonding orbital and will actually weaken the bond. Conversely, an antibonding orbital will more closely resemble the higher energy atomic basis. Electrons in non-bonding orbitals tend to be in deep orbitals associated almost entirely with one nucleus or the other, and thus they spend equal time within as they do between nuclei. These electrons neither contribute to nor detract from bond strength and thus are reffered to as lone pairs.
Now in the above figure the orbitals are combining resulting in the formation of bonding and anti-bonding orbitals.Like 1s combine to form bonding and anti-bonding orbitals.Similarly for 2pz and 2px.Filling of electrons in these orbitals follow the rules-Aufbau’s principle,Hund’s rule and Pauli’s Exclusion principle.Energy is increasing towards upwards which shows bonding orbitals have lower energy than anti-bonding orbitals.
Vineeth
19 Points
9 years ago
Thanks for your deep answer ,
I have more doubt from your answer i belive you will help me to get me out of it.
They are
  1. Why 2Py is not participating ihere?
  2. In the statment “ . Can only PI bonds can form multiple bonds? multiple bonds then can result due to the additional formation of pi bonds between overlapping orbitals of like symmetries.Electrons in sigma bonds are located between the nuclei, while electrons in pi bonds are delocalized in regions above and below the nuclei”
  3. Can you explain more about LCAO.
  4. Can you explain this statement “The Schrödinger equation is used to build up the orbital bases of an atom or molecule”
  5. In statement given below The atomic orbitals of lower energy contributes more to the molicular orbital ; it means that the electron is displaced from lower orbital . but how this can be possible to remove the electron from lower energy levels before removing the electron from higher energy level ? And can you explain the underlind line in the statement.causing the molecular orbital to more closely resemble it, For bonding orbitals, the atomic orbital of lower energy contributes more to the molecular orbitalthan the two contributing atomic bases. lower energy “A bonding orbital is of
  6. The statement This statement means that its kinetic energy is converted into another form that makes the anti bonding actually weaken. Then what is the need for forming bond (Bonds are formed for making the atom stable by giving out energy ) why tihs happens?“If the electrons tend to be present in a molecular orbital in which they spend more time elsewhere than between the nuclei, the orbital will function as an anti-bonding orbital and will actually weaken the bond.”
  7. In two statement can you explain the under lined words meaning in the statement. associated almost entirely with one nucleus or the other, and thus they spend equal time within as they do between nuclei”deep orbitals. Electrons in non-bonding orbitals tend to be in atomic basis“Conversely, an antibonding orbital will more closely resemble the higher energy
  8. Can you explain the statement “Energy is increasing towards upwards which shows bonding orbitals have lower energy than anti-bonding orbitals”
  9. In the figure                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            The  black dot represent nuclei . But I dont understand what it meant by ‘+’ sign ?
  10. In figure 1s – 1s  gives Sigma star 1s                                                                                          In that RHS side of formation in the figure , from where the -ve sign comes in bubble . Is that  mean partial charge? And Is the line dividing the two shapes is internuclear axis.
  11. In figure                                                                                                                                           1s+1s gives sigma 1s           “Here as you told the electron will be moving under the influence of both the nuclei . can you check my point of view, is it correct or wrong”
britto george
96 Points
9 years ago
this is a simple question and you can get good things from solving this so just try

Think You Can Provide A Better Answer ?

ASK QUESTION

Get your questions answered by the expert for free