Use Coupon: CART20 and get 20% off on all online Study Material

Total Price: R

There are no items in this cart.
Continue Shopping
Get instant 20% OFF on Online Material.
coupon code: MOB20 | View Course list

  • Complete Physics Course - Class 11
  • OFFERED PRICE: R 2,800
  • View Details
Get extra R 560 off


how can earth be a black hole


7 years ago


Answers : (2)



In 1916, when general relativity was new, Karl Schwarzschild worked out a useful solution to the Einstein equation describing the evolution of spacetime geometry. This solution, a possible shape of spacetime, would describe the effects of gravity *outside* a spherically symmetric, uncharged, nonrotating object (and would serve approximately to describe even slowly rotating objects like the Earth or Sun). It worked in much the same way that you can treat the Earth as a point mass for purposes of Newtonian gravity if all you want to do is describe gravity *outside* the Earth's surface.

What such a solution really looks like is a "metric," which is a kind of generalization of the Pythagorean formula that gives the length of a line segment in the plane. The metric is a formula that may be used to obtain the "length" of a curve in spacetime. In the case of a curve corresponding to the motion of an object as time passes (a "timelike worldline,") the "length" computed by the metric is actually the elapsed time experienced by an object with that motion. The actual formula depends on the coordinates chosen in which to express things, but it may be transformed into various coordinate systems without affecting anything physical, like the spacetime curvature. Schwarzschild expressed his metric in terms of coordinates which, at large distances from the object, resembled spherical coordinates with an extra coordinate t for time. Another coordinate, called r, functioned as a radial coordinate at large distances; out there it just gave the distance to the massive object.

Now, at small radii, the solution began to act strangely. There was a "singularity" at the center, r=0, where the curvature of spacetime was infinite. Surrounding that was a region where the "radial" direction of decreasing r was actually a direction in *time* rather than in space. Anything in that region, including light, would be obligated to fall toward the singularity, to be crushed as tidal forces diverged. This was separated from the rest of the universe by a place where Schwarzschild's coordinates blew up, though nothing was wrong with the curvature of spacetime there. (This was called the Schwarzschild radius. Later, other coordinate systems were discovered in which the blow-up didn't happen; it was an artifact of the coordinates, a little like the problem of defining the longitude of the North Pole. The physically important thing about the Schwarzschild radius was not the coordinate problem, but the fact that within it the direction into the hole became a direction in time.)

Nobody really worried about this at the time, because there was no known object that was dense enough for that inner region to actually be outside it, so for all known cases, this odd part of the solution would not apply. Arthur Stanley Eddington considered the possibility of a dying star collapsing to such a density, but rejected it as aesthetically unpleasant and proposed that some new physics must intervene. In 1939, Oppenheimer and Snyder finally took seriously the possibility that stars a few times more massive than the sun might be doomed to collapse to such a state at the end of their lives.

Once the star gets smaller than the place where Schwarzschild's coordinates fail (called the Schwarzschild radius for an uncharged, nonrotating object, or the event horizon) there's no way it can avoid collapsing further. It has to collapse all the way to a singularity for the same reason that you can't keep from moving into the future! Nothing else that goes into that region afterward can avoid it either, at least in this simple case. The event horizon is a point of no return.

In 1971 John Archibald Wheeler named such a thing a black hole, since light could not escape from it. Astronomers have many candidate objects they think are probably black holes, on the basis of several kinds of evidence (typically they are dark objects whose large mass can be deduced from their gravitational effects on other objects, and which sometimes emit X-rays, presumably from infalling matter). But the properties of black holes I'll talk about here are entirely theoretical. They're based on general relativity, which is a theory that seems supported by available evidence.

Hence Earth cannot become a black hole.

7 years ago


Black Holes are regions of space in which gravitational fields are so strong that no particle or signal can escape the pull of gravity. The boundary of this no-escape region is called the event horizon, since distant observers outside the black hole cannot see (cannot get light from) events inside.

Although the fundamental possibility of such an object exists within Newton's classical theory of gravitation, Einstein's theory of gravity makes black holes inevitable under some circumstances. Prior to the early 1960s black holes seemed to be only an interesting theoretical concept with no astrophysical plausibility, but with the discovery of quasars in 1963 it became clear that very exotic astrophysical objects could exist. Nowadays it is taken for granted that black holes do exist in at least two different forms. Stellar mass black holes are the endpoint of the death of some stars, and supermassive black holes are the result of coalescences in the centers of most galaxies, including our own.

No signal can propagate from inside a black hole, but the gravitational influence of a black hole is always present. (This influence does not propagate out of the hole; it is permanently present outside, and depends only on the total amount of mass, angular momentum, and electric charge that have gone into forming the hole.) Black holes can be detected through the influence of this strong gravity on the surroundings just outside the hole. In this way, stellar mass holes produce detectable X-rays, supermassive black holes produce a wide spectrum of electromagnetic signals, and both types can be inferred from the orbital motion of luminous stars and matter around them. Phenomena involving black holes of any mass can produce strong gravitational waves, and are of interest as sources for present and future gravitational wave detectors.

7 years ago

Post Your Answer

Other Related Questions on Electrostatics

Can someone help with Q16 that`s in the attachment. Thank you.
The correct answer for this question is 3C/4. For solving these types of questions, mark the capacitor plates having same voltages and then simplify the circuit diagram by connecting the...
Raman Mishra 4 months ago
@ ashmeet as in this circuit there are no battery or cell combination . so, this ques becomes easy. just redraw the circuit where 3 of them are in parallely connected . then applying the...
Umakant biswal 4 months ago
I think the answer will be option d because the first 3 capacitors are undoubtedly parallel but the next 2 capacitors are parallel and finally the first 3 next 2 and the last one are in...
Archishman khasnovis 4 months ago
Four identical large metal plates are arranged parallel to each other, with equal gaps in between. They are given charges q, 2q, 3q and 4q (counting from any one side). The outermost plates...
these are plates or wire first confirm that because in begining u wrote plates then in end it is wire. plz send figure if u have of this question. KINDLY CHECK THIS AGAIN :-))))))))))))
prateek 3 months ago
Sir here the wire is the one which is used for shor
Apurv Sirohi 2 months ago
Sir here the wire is the one which is used for
Apurv Sirohi 2 months ago
Q1.....A is the correct answer...How?.............????
VERY EASY QUESTION. +q and -q makes a dipole. SEE ch electrostatics class12. suppose test charge on p. THEN due to +q it was repelled and due to -q it is attracted. then simple laws of...
prateek 2 months ago
this a very ea
prateek 2 months ago
prateek 2 months ago
what is work energy thereom...................................?
The work-energy theorem is a generalized description of motion which states that work done by the sum of all forces acting on an object is equal to change in that object’s kinetic energy....
dolly bhatia one month ago
The work W done by the net force on a particle equals the change in the particle`s kinetic energy KE: W = Δ K E = 1 2 m v f 2 − 1 2 m v i 2 . The work-energy theorem can be derived from...
Sushmit Trivedi one month ago
For any net force acting on a particle moving along any curvilinear path, it can be demonstrated that its work equals the change in the kinetic energy of the particle by a simple derivation...
rahul kushwaha 3 months ago
The cieling of long hall is 25 m high What is the maximum horizontal distance that a ball thrown with a speed of 40 ms can go without hitting the ceiling of wall? Plz explain with a DIAGRAM
Let the angle of throwing be Q with respect to the ground So, the range is R = 40*cosQ*t where t = time taken reach ground. Now, we know the time taken to reach the top of its flight is half...
Tapas Khanda 5 months ago
Let the angle of throwing be Q with respect to the ground So, the range is R = 30*cosQ*t where t = time taken reach ground. Now, we know the time taken to reach the top of its flight is half...
Tapas Khanda 5 months ago
Diagram is not required to solve this question. You can directly use the formula to find range : R = (v^2/g)*sin2Q Maximum height reached, H = v^2*sin^2Q/2g So, 25 = 40^2*sin^2Q/(2*9.8) So,...
Tapas Khanda 5 months ago
What harmfull gases are produced when we burn plastics? And can we burn plastics?
I`m doing a project, can someone help me, How to reduce those toxic contents when plantic are burnt Like sulphur, nitrogen etc
2017 years ago
nitrogen gas , sulphur dioxide ,carbon monoxide , carbon dioxide. are some of the gases. well burning plastic is not good for living things. but there are many other things that are more...
View all Questions »

  • Complete Physics Course - Class 12
  • OFFERED PRICE: R 2,600
  • View Details
Get extra R 520 off

  • Complete Physics Course - Class 11
  • OFFERED PRICE: R 2,800
  • View Details

Get extra R 560 off

More Questions On Electrostatics

Ask Experts

Have any Question? Ask Experts

Post Question

Answer ‘n’ Earn
Attractive Gift
To Win!!!
Click Here for details